|
July-September, 2005
International agencies need to take the time to
understand local groups
Linda Mylle
The meeting hall was packed with representatives of
the world’s most renowned humanitarian organisations
and assorted others when I reached breaking point. It
seemed that every speaker who addressed the crowd of
sweating expatriates mentioned the dire need to seek
input from local non-governmental organisations
(NGOs).
This was week five of the post-tsunami disaster relief
effort, and I was at the main coordinating meeting for
UN and international agencies in Banda Aceh. Yet not a
single local NGO or government representative appeared
to be present.
Finally, after updates from the food, education,
health and other ‘sectors’, the UN coordinator opened
the floor to participants. I raised my hand not
knowing exactly what I would say. The desperation and
frustration of my Acehnese NGO friends — too busy to
come and too proud to appear at a disadvantage in this
English-speaking gathering — had rubbed off on me.
But the words came. I told them that local NGOs were
hurting badly, but that they were also working to
within an inch of exhaustion on the same issues
everybody here faced. I also made a suggestion: if
international agencies could send several support
staff to help out local groups, this would help them
recover and also foster better relations. Could any of
those present spare a couple of Indonesian staff to
work with local NGOs for one or two weeks?
What seemed to me like a modest request drew nothing
but blank looks from the upturned faces. After a
moment of hesitation, the UN coordinator informed me
that I should make my request at the ‘administration
and human resources’ sectoral meeting on Wednesday at
11 o’clock.
This story of my first encounter with the
international humanitarian industry produced raucous
laughter later at the Aceh NGO Forum, where several
leaders had gathered. They had been on the
merry-go-round for weeks and slapped me on the back,
welcoming me to the ranks of the disillusioned.
I nevertheless went to the meeting on Wednesday, where
a woman representing a medium-sized organisation from
Australia wished me luck getting anything like human
resource support out of the foreign humanitarian
contingent. Admittedly, the 200-odd international NGOs
in Banda Aceh at the time were under enormous pressure
to feed, clothe and shelter the estimated 200,000
people living in makeshift camps across the province.
Members of their own teams had gone weeks without a
day off and there was little time to fill out their
own ranks — or supplement those of the local groups.
None of those attending the sectoral meeting offered
to provide staff to help the local groups.
Rocky engagement
The laughter of friends was the best balm to soothe
the injuries suffered on their behalf that day.
Laughter is heard everywhere here. It attests to the
people’s deep resilience and stoicism in meeting the
fate determined by Allah the Almighty. Now Allah has
sent a tsunami and a legion of well-meaning
foreigners. If you ask people here, they’ll say that
there is a reason for everything. This presumably
includes why local and international organisations are
struggling to come to terms with each other.
In attempting to explain why, one cannot go past the
fact that almost everything about the situation was —
and in many ways remains — overwhelming for all
concerned.
As a translator volunteering with local NGOs, I found
myself traversing the world of local groups into the
international orbit and back again. From my vantage
point, it seemed that both worlds had many
similarities: virtually all organisations lacked
transport and telecommunications equipment, ran
logistics and medical operations, struggled to assess
and meet the needs of displaced communities and
operated at a frantic pace.
During the first month, both local and international
relief coordinators received around 60 text messages
and 50 phone calls each day — and sent out just as
many. Everybody stressed the importance of
coordinating relief efforts better, but most operated
according to their own limitations on whatever
information came to hand.
The evident similarities, however, only ran so deep.
‘You’d think the tsunami hit the UN and not Acehnese
NGOs,’ a fellow volunteer commented after a
particularly frenetic day witnessing local and
international NGOs at work. The international groups
may have struggled to find staff, office space and
equipment, but local NGO offices were wiped from the
face of the earth in the space of half an hour, along
with countless loved ones, friends and colleagues.
International NGOs also overlooked one important fact:
when it came to the humanitarian relief effort, local
NGO workers saw themselves not as victims of the
tsunami but as survivors toughened by the experience
of living under militaristic rule for the better part
of 20 years.
The mixed bag of international workers who arrived
were generally torn from metropolitan jobs or were
more accustomed to working under dictatorships in
various states of collapse. They also had little time
to consider that in some cases by day two of the
disaster the locals had moved into action in
cooperation with colleagues from Jakarta and other
provinces.
Unfortunately, as the international agencies and NGOs
‘took charge’ of the relief effort, many local leaders
felt their — relatively small-scale — work was being
dismissed as insignificant.
Talking to one another
If misperceptions were a major stumbling block to
fledgling relations between local and international
NGOs, a lack of skilled interpreters compounded the
problem. This became apparent by week six, when the
rapid turnover and shifts in displaced populatiýns
began to settle down and international NGOs decided
the emergency period was over. International
representatives subsequently descended on local NGOs
seeking partners, or at least input, into their
programs for Aceh’s ‘recovery and reconstruction’.
The handful of experienced international NGO
representatives fluent in Indonesian were far
outnumbered by jet-setting disaster junkies and
rosy-cheeked new recruits, many of whom arrived
without securing the means to bridge the language
barrier.
Never mind. Even local volunteers with no English grew
accustomed to the litany of catch phrases that cropped
up with maddening regularity, such as ‘civil society
empowerment’, ‘similar programs in Kosovo/Sierra
Leone/ Afghanistan’, ‘rapid assessment’, ‘we’re
looking for implementing partners’ and ‘organisational
capacity building’.
I recall a man from a previously unheard-of
international group sitting himself down in the lotus
position on the floor of a local NGO office one night
and proceeding to drop every one of these phrases as
dozens of volunteers rushed around us. The third
mention of ‘capacity building’ was too much for me:
someone very dear to my NGO friends had just passed
away from severe pneumonia caused by inhaling the
black dregs of the tsunami water.
This was not the last time I felt compelled to ask an
international worker to come back at a more suitable
time. A group headed by a particularly curmudgeonly
and sweaty man arrived in late January on Idul Adha,
the second most significant religious holiaay of the
Muslim calendar, which locals looked forward to as a
brief respite from the turmoil.
On both these occasions and many others, the local NGO
crew sat, smiled and offered whatever information or
insight seemed relevant. ‘Don’t worry about it,’ one
said to assuage my consternation on Idul Adha.
‘They’re all under a lot of pressure to spend the
millions of dollars donated for Aceh.’
There is certainly no shortage of good will. It has
been as overwhelming as the disaster itself and is
helping to carry the people of Aceh through
heartbreaking times. Some of the misperceptions of the
past are righting themselves due to the relief
effort’s great achievements. The commitment to
breathing new life into Aceh remains strong.
But if the international NGOs are emissaries of the
private citizens whose individual donations and tax
dollars are supporting them, they need to boost the
human aspects of the humanitarian effort.
Now that several months have passed, if international
agencies and NGOs ask about developing better
relations with local groups, I tell them to start by
sending a few people to discuss matters over a
friendly round of the home-grown coffee that is the
pride of Aceh. I did a lot of that in the midst of the
craziness and feel I learned more from my Acehnese
friends than I was able to contribute.

Linda
Mylle (not her real name) is an international
volunteer trying her best to work with Acehnese NGOs
in Banda Aceh. |